Clendening Valley Crossing/Siphon

"Croton Aqueduct at Clendinning Valley" by F.B. Tower

Street Address/Location:  Parallel to and slightly west of Columbus Avenue from 95th Street to 102nd Street

Town/City:  New York

County:  Manhattan

Owner: N/A

STRUCTURE/PROPERTY

Architect/Engineer/Other Responsible Parties:  Fayette B. Tower, Engineer; Bishop & Campbell, Contractor

Historic Use:  To convey the Old Croton Aqueduct at grade across the Clendening Valley. 

Present Use:  N/A

Typology:  Crossing/Aqueduct Bridge

Architectural Style:  Classical

Period(s) of Construction: ~1839-1841

Date of Decommissioning:  1870s 

Date(s) of Demolition:  1870s

Structural System/Materials:  Granite ashlar masonry bridge supporting brick conduit and cast iron pipe

Brief Architectural Description: This aqueduct was constructed to span the small valley found in this area.  The crossing consisted of a solid masonry wall carrying a brick conduit lined with iron.  The wall was broken in three places–at 98th, 99th, and 100th streets–by tripartite openings, each consisting of a large (30 feet wide) central span for carriages flanked on either side by smaller (10 feet wide) side spans for pedestrians.  The wall completely blocked the paths of the future 96th, 97th, and 101st Streets.  The entire structure  was demolished and replaced with underground pipe in the 1870s.

Brief Statement of Historic Significance:  The somewhat irregular structure of the crossing (a solid masonry wall pierced in a few places by arches to allow for through traffic) was the product of political compromise:  “When the Whigs gained control of state government in 1840 (for two years), they impaneled a slate of cost-cutting water commissioners (led by old alderman Samuel Stevens) who won a vote by the politically divided Common Council to scrap the planned Clendening arches in favor of a cheaper solid wall.  Democrat Isaac Varian responded with the first veto by a New York mayor.  Varian explained that not only was the council order beyond the council’s authority and a violation of existing contracts, but the unbroken wall it mandated would be a barrier to development.  And so a Solomonic compromise was made:  a solid wall would rise at the northern and southern ends, comprising half the valley crossing’s length, and the partially constructed nine-arched midsection would be completed.  Within twenty years, the Clendening farm was gone, and the streets and sidewalks of 98th, 99th, and 100th streets passed beneath those arches.  In the 1870s, development demanded more:  the aqueduct section was shifted underground into a pipe siphon and the entire valley crossing–the arched central portion and the solid wall blocking 96th, 97th, and 101st Streets–was torn down.  Some might say that the valley has never countenanced its development:  after its degeneration into a dense region of shabby tenements, 1950s urban renewal delivered the current ‘banal … slab and balcony’ high-rise apartments of Park West Village” (Koeppel, “The Rise to Croton,” 45-48).

INTERPRETATION

Accessibility to Public:  N/A

Landmark Status:  No

Threats:  N/A

Current Interpretation: None

Image:  F.B. Tower.  Illustrations of the Croton Aqueduct.  New York and London:  Wiley and Putnam, 1843.

SOURCES

Gerard Koeppel, “The Rise to Croton.”  Water-Works: The Architecture and Engineering of the New York City Water Supply.  Kevin Bone, ed., Gina Pollare, Associate Editor.  New York:  Monacelli Press, The Irwin S. Chanin School of Archtiecture of the Cooper Union, 2006.  Pgs. 45-48

Gerard A. Koeppel.  Water for Gotham: A History.  Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2000.  Pgs. 215, 231, 235-236, 243, 254, 257-258, 290

FICHE PREPARED BY

Jørgen G. Cleemann

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s